Skip to content

build(deps): update typescript-eslint to v8.59.0 (main)#187

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/main-typescript-eslint
Open

build(deps): update typescript-eslint to v8.59.0 (main)#187
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/main-typescript-eslint

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.58.28.59.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.58.28.59.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.59.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] report more cases based on assignability (#​11789)
❤️ Thank You
  • Ulrich Stark

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.59.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

renovate Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.


  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants